Pokerstars Rigged 13 Antworten

Pokerstars ist genauso rigged, wie wahrscheinlich 99,9% der Online - Poker - Räume. Ich suche schon lange einen Raum wo es anders läuft Egal noch. iluya: Sagt mal bin ich der einzige bei dem Pokerstars das varianzreichste ist was es gibt? Auf die letzten 25k Hands mit AA KK AK QQ AQ AJ. Ich habe also die öffentlich zugängliche Datenbank (Link siehe vorheriger Beitrag zu PokerStars ist rigged) genommen und alle Fälle aussortiert, bei denen KK All. Stattdessen: Habe was im Turnier gewonnen und jetzt direkt im Cashgame verloren. Dann wieder bad beats in Turnieren. Antwort: Pokerstars = Betrug. Für diese Aluhut-Träger ist es ein Leichtes, sich eigene absurde Theorien auszudenken, warum Online-Poker rigged sein muss. Oder wie viele.

Pokerstars Rigged

iluya: Sagt mal bin ich der einzige bei dem Pokerstars das varianzreichste ist was es gibt? Auf die letzten 25k Hands mit AA KK AK QQ AQ AJ. Stattdessen: Habe was im Turnier gewonnen und jetzt direkt im Cashgame verloren. Dann wieder bad beats in Turnieren. Antwort: Pokerstars = Betrug. Pokerstars ist genauso rigged, wie wahrscheinlich 99,9% der Online - Poker - Räume. Ich suche schon lange einen Raum wo es anders läuft Egal noch.

Another point of concern for poker players considering PokerStars is that the company has never received accreditation from the Better Business Bureau.

This was true prior to the UIGEA, and it is true even now in the states where the brand has a legal presence. The BBB does track international companies, however, and although it has not accredited or rated PokerStars, it does have a file for the company in nearly every state.

There are a significant number of complaints on file, and we urge everyone to check with their local BBB to consider local experiences with the PokerStars brand.

The most egregious act destroying any remaining goodwill PokerStars may have had came very recently. On May 1, , PokerStars sent an email to its online marketing partners drastically changing the terms of their agreements, causing significant damage to all of their Internet partners for their own benefit.

Marketing partners of PokerStars had an agreement — that they would receive a certain percentage of the revenues that PokerStars earned off players referred by that partner.

And that revenue share plan would persist for the life of the player. On May 1, , PokerStars unilaterally changed the terms to only compensate their marketing partners for only two years.

What this means is that marketing partners that have been supporting and promoting PokerStars for years and years will lose all revenues from those players.

They will only get compensated for players from the past 2 years. Basically, this is a breach of contract and PokerStars is more than willing to completely screw their partners.

If PokerStars is willing to do this to their business partners, then what are they willing to do to their players? If you win a big tournament, what prevents PokerStars from immediately changing their terms to not pay you out?!

We believe that all of these poor decisions stemmed from the fact that PokerStars decided to break US law by continuing to offer their services to Americans.

PokerStars was guilty — and when online poker became legalized in New Jersey, Nevada, and Delaware, with the potential of California coming next, some laws had a bad actor clause — which disallowed PokerStars from entering the market since they were illegally operating in the US previously.

Associating with the owners — the Scheinbergs — prevented PokerStars from entering US markets, which eventually led to the sale of PokerStars to Amaya.

And this new change of ownership has led to the issues we see today. Amaya does not care about the players or the business partners of PokerStars.

Amaya added a 2. Amaya increased the rake at PokerStars in late ! Sorry, but we have to call it. PokerStars is a scam.

Create your own review. I have deleted my account with PokerStars in frustration and encouraging my friends to play on a different site.

Ridiculous in every possible way. I am going to keep this short. A lot of players who complain about Poker Stars being rigged are fish.

And that is a problem because it discredits good players who also point out that there are major issues with Poker Stars.

I do think their tournaments play the way they should. I made a lot of final tables and the bad beats seem normal in tournaments. I am NOT at all complaining about bad beats in cash games because that is almost impossible to prove or disprove easily and so many bad players who would be losing no matter what complain about bad beats.

Here is the issue however. I am a good player and I have lost relatively little money minus the rake at poker Stars Cash games. But I find it impossible to win even though there are plenty of bad players.

But here is what exposes Poker Stars for the frauds that they are. In their cash games I played over , hand without one serious upswing.

I play 6 to 8 tables and about hands a day. Did this for 4 straight months and did NOT once get a bb stack over bb. This lack of upswing variance over this sample size is clearly not a natural phenomena.

That has to be man made. I can prove this too. They have the records and I also have many records.

I do see new players and fish who make many buy ins getting big stacks and that is what kept me optimistic for so long. Also I am a very aggressive player, I am not afraid to jam J J if someone has a weak 3 betting range and 4 bet calling or jamming range.

I am considering a law suit. Not to make money for myself but to demand fair playing cash games for strong players.

Their software apparently protects the fish from the sharks, or as one of their CEOs said, they protect the vulnerable. That could be taken several ways, but I am not the only one who noticed that even strong players are not winning much if at all in their cash games and even when there are plenty of weak players in the game.

The whole 50NL Zoom in Europe is said to be so strong that players there make bets on who can break even. Well that is not the case here in the USA, we have plenty of big fish playing, and we do not have Zoom.

Here is what I can prove in court, I played over , cash game hands with out a single big upswing and could not even get 50 stack over dollars in the 50 NL cash games.

The 30 NL cash games I could get some bigger stacks but that was mostly do to inducing people into making huge bluffs and not because there were two strong hands against each other.

Recently I had A 10 off and there was a huge crazy bluffer in the 50NL. I he 3 bet and I 4 bet to Isolate him while he was out of position.

Flop came A 10 6 rainbow. Nice right, well I c bet he called, turn came a I checked he checked. River came a brick I bet very small 1 4th pot cause I figured he would jam, this guy was a massive fish.

The small bet made him Jam. Guess what he had 2 5 suited. I started to realize that the vast majority of my big wins were bluffs, and typically when I made a big hand my opponent had nothing.

Stars can put out the right hand distributions over time, but what they do not look at is who gets what and win. I was a Lehigh U physics math major.

I am NOT some fish complaining about bad beats. This is about getting nothing over a huge sample size. I study poker 3 hours a day on average.

Over Forgive any typos I just woke up and did not get a lot of sleep, though why I am saying is very important as what I am saying is actually provable.

I am making NO complaints about bad beats here. There was an initial period where I had a few good days with upswings, but then it literally stopped for over , hands.

I am an aggressive player, but the point here is that it does not matter if I am a great player or a fish. I am a good hand reader and avoid a lot of coolers, that being said I 3 bet light, I check raise bluff flops, with my draws, that hit my range hard.

I isolation raise and am not afraid to jam when the math is right. I am not talking about winning money or losing money here, I am talking about going over a half million hands with not one single upswing.

I have read that Poker Stars tries to protect the fish from the sharks. Main reason is they do no not want the good players to win all the money and drive away the bad players who keep buying in new all the time.

One of the reasons I gave the site so much of a chance is because I would see new players and fish make big stacks, to bbs and that made me happy because I thought it must be legit.

Only problem is no matter how hard I tried I could not get a single stack over bbs. I play 6 to 8 tables on average and about hands per day.

Over 40 months this comes to approx. I can only conclude that something is very wrong as this simply would not happen without some human intervention.

I play very well, Poker Snowie ranks me between World Class and Extraterrestrial on big sample sizes.

But this does not matter because both the worst and best players in the world would have some big stacks over a half million hand sample size.

In fact they should have some big hands over a much smaller sample size. Poker Stars cash games play like a somewhat improved version of 3 6 limit.

Improved because fish and maniacs will all in bluff sometimes. That was another issue. I was making some money during the first 2 months of the pandemic shutdown.

Though I realized it was not because of my hand vs my opponents hand very often but mostly when I induced people to make huge bluffs.

Usually bet betting real small and pretending to be weak. The lack of strong hand vs strong hand was disconcerting. All too often it was a very strong hand vs a very weak hand.

Poker Stars Tournaments seem to play fine though. I made a lot of final tables and hit the bubble often. There are bad beats but they seem to work in an even way that is fair over time for the tournaments.

I am not complaining about bad beats. I am complaining about playing over , hands and not get one single heater or big upswing. Do to good hand reading skills I did not lose very much, but they made it so that I could not win much and would untimely lose slowly cause of rake.

Against all very strong players that would not be unreasonable to expect, but here in the USA a lot of the players are bad.

At least 15 percent to 30 percent. Another issue I had was the casino free play. I played black jack with the free money they give you, and found that black jack was so easy to win with the free money, in fact I had to try to lose cause it was so boring.

Of course when I switched to real money all a sudden winning at blackjack seemed impossible. Well it should be online and I expect to lose with black jack.

That is why I do NOT play black jack normally. But Poker Stars gave me this free play money, that you can not cash, you have to score points, anyway this happened on 3 occasions and each time it was clear that black jack was a give away with the free money and something really bad with real money.

I did not lose much as I am not a gambler. I play plus EV plays. I gave poker stars a chance but with over , hands played at their cash games, while playing 6 to 8 tables, and not getting one BB stack over BBs over , hands, there is something clearly wrong and that is also very easy proof that poker stars is doing something that can only be called cheating.

You will have a hell of a time proving rigged coolers and frankly a lot of people who complain about poker being rigged are in fact fish, but not everyone.

Many good players notice something is off too, however the point here is that I went over , hands without even one big upswing.

That can not happen random, that is human intervention for certain. I was a math physics major, I have a USCF official Expert rating over so you are not talking to the average game player.

I believe we should sue poker stars and they have no right to manipulate the cash games. Keep in mind that I do NOT believe that they are cheating at tournaments.

The tournaments seem to play fair to me, but the cash games are playing similar to a slot machine but with no big jackpots.

Poker is poker and they think they are cleaver, however there is no answer whatsoever that can justify OVER , hands with NO big upswings at all.

I am very angry about this. Im not impressed with pokerstars. Although the site is beautiful. I emailed them 6 times and still no response!

I never recieved the proper bonus i was expecting! When I finally did speak with someone about it, they did absolutely nothing for me!

They get one star for a nice looking site! Other than that I was not impressed! Anyone who has played on this site for more then a few days will absolutely recognize this scenario: You flop 2-pair on a uncoordinated board.

You bet and maybe one other player raises. Maybe you end up re-raising and the other player goes all-in. Of course you call. What happens next?

The turn and the river comes 5 and 5 and you lose to trip 5's. Sarcasm definately intended. I can't tell you how many times I've seen hands like this play out.

The article above mentioned that "what PokerStars earns is based on the total pot no matter who wins it". I also has issues getting money out of the site.

Like many poker sites, getting money in is easy. Getting it out can be next to impossible. I'm done and I won't be going back.

Just as a final note, my friends and I labeled PokerStars "the place where two-pair go to die". It's funny because it's true. I am a retired poker dealer of many years and I refuse to accept their opinion of how the cards are dealt with an algorythm that is supposedly random.

There is no way in hell that the flops of 2 and 1 come up that many times in a real game and the bad beats This is a very disgusting site and the customer service I honestly believe that they have so called "BOTS" being fictional players, just to line their own pockets.

There is just no way that you can lose so many pots to random cards like that. I sure hope that the proper people do see this and take some kind of action, just to see for themselves Too bad that we don't know who is the real culprit behind the doors of this scamming site I won't be back PokerStars has significant problems with Customer Service and isn't doing the best job with this and deserves criticism.

They also deserve criticism for how they handled dismantling their SuperNova scheme. However much of the above is fact-less garbage that ought to be ignored.

EVERY player "beats the odds" on multiple occasions. They aren't really "beating the odds" just experiencing standard statistical variation. PS' RNG random number generator is independently verified so perhaps check your facts before making silly assertions like this.

Every poker site has lots of people complaining about bad beats as though the universe circles around them. It doesn't - every player gets them - you aren't special.

As someone who nearly lost a chunk of my bankroll when fulltilt went under, I was very glad that PokerStars paid me this when they bought the company.

Ditto with PKR. They are far from perfect and need to raise their game with CS but scam? Obviously not. PokerStars are now active in the US btw.

PA, NJ and likely more states opening up soon as well. So out of date - often inaccurate, poorly researched article above. Ignore and do your own research.

Absolutely terrible, no customer service, they wont even try to help with the smallest issue.. I am amazed that they are operating at all, and have learned to do more research before helping a company profit.

I do not believe the site is rigged in regards to cheating because it makes no sense as previously stated by others.

I do feel the "random card generator" algorithm is not what it should be and does not deliver cards with the percentages over the long hall of a dealer with a shuffle machine.

Way too many bad beats regardless of which side of it you're on. I could be wrong, but it sure doesn't seem as it plays out that way.

Anyway, to me a mediocre poker experience, but no scam. Same m. I put money in and easily run it up to 3or 4 times my investment. Then it happens.

You start to lose consistently. I love the believers who drank the cool aid , who try and spew the same crap. After watching my account depleted repeatedly, I started to document my play.

The one statistic , which is so glaring is this one. Over hundreds of hand i had AK hole cards 32 times. I have won 1 of those. And the losses are so laughable and obvious.

Pocket deuces. Runner runner everything. River cards that have become predictable. Simply put if I can predict all my losses I should not be playing in this medium.

If the percentage of winning certain hands is not the same on ps then it must be rigged. Its bad enought that its possible to predict that its likely when playing to know almost every time what card will arrive to beat you so they can finish their dodgy tournaments quicker but now money is disappearing from my account its a complete scam.

Rigged or not? Favor a player to win — or themselves to get rich? Every player has the chance to win prizes, entry to live events and major online tournaments.

PokerStars gives away more rewards than any other poker site. Join millions of PokerStars users around the world and prove your skills.

Our games are intended for individuals aged 18 and above for amusement purposes only. These games do not offer real money gambling or an opportunity to win real money.

Practice or success at social games does not imply future success at real money gambling. All Rights Reserved. Welcome to the home of free-to-play poker.

Points can now be exchanged for cash and there are a number of private VIP freeroll tournaments taking place at least weekly. Wrapping up the promotional offerings are a number of region-specific events that are only offered for players in certain parts of the world such as Asia, Australia, Brazil, Latin America, Portugal, and Norway.

Although neither is truly better than those offered by their main competitors with the enormous number of games and tournaments offered getting anything extra is appreciated.

Life offers 3 certainties every day: the sun will rise, the sun will set, and the PokerStars cash games will be tighter than the Gordian knot.

That means fewer casual players dumping chips to the grinders just for the experience. PokerStars has always been the poker room du jour of the online poker elitist, wannabe poker pro, dedicated grinder, and serious tournament player.

The problem with that in the game quality context is that those are the tightest and most well-educated poker groups there are.

There is some degree of change as the games get slightly looser at the penny games rather than the dollar ones but even those micro limit players fight surprisingly hard for each penny.

Check my tips section for more thoughts. Playing games here is a different beast in that most players are either timid or just good players.

Cash games may not be the most profitable on average here but they can be refreshing for players burned out on bad beats. Casual recreational players, i.

PokerStars started their assault on grinders users third-party software, who could realistically kill the industry if given enough time to drive away recreational players.

The poker room severely limited HUDs heads-up displays and other third-party poker tracking software to try to marginalize the unfair advantage they were gaining over pure players.

With the proliferation of rock-tight games over the past years I love the movement by poker sites of purifying the games again and protecting the essential part of the poker ecosystem: inexperienced players.

One of the main draws of PokerStars is the tournament offerings thanks to its status as the 1 online poker room in the world in terms of traffic. They have an unmatched number of satellites not only to live tournaments, but also to their own guaranteed events.

Tournaments are structured well by providing an easy-to-understand lobby, giving players a l arge amount of starting chips relative to the blinds, and allowing sufficient time between blinds.

I prefer this structure personally as it tends to give a slightly larger edge towards skilled players.

As PokerStars has been experiencing a huge boost in overall traffic the past few years the tournament traffic is massive. Not everything has worked — remember Duel?

See the chart below for the exact numbers. This is a strange timed tournament where play just stops after 5 minutes no matter how many players are left.

With several thousand players competing for even the micro buy-in overnight events every tournament is a spectacle and every tournament offers substantial prizes.

They allow you to upload your own image as your avatar, which is a neat little feature that a most poker rooms are now picking up on.

In terms of new table customizations, you can resize any table window or tile them to whatever size you desire. Next, they have new themes that allow you to change the graphical theme to things like Marine, Stars, Saloon, and Renaissance.

These tables tend to enjoy a hand per hour improvement over standard tables. PokerStars has also added what they call Zoom Poker, which I feel is really the most significant development in online poker since its inception.

A few non-US poker rooms have similar riffs on this gameplay style and it should only be a matter of time before everyone else gets on board.

As soon as you fold the software finds 8 more players who have also just folded to create a new table. The only negative is in the loss of reads with the table constantly changing players, but online reads have always been questionable at best.

The tightness of players also ratchets up even higher than normal PokerStars tables thank to the lack or boredom and urgency to play something.

The speed and functionality of the mobile experience is quite good, thanks to the decision to develop a standalone app over a buggy mobile browser-based system.

Most poker rooms will happily accept player deposits immediately, but they make sure they send withdrawals back with the same gusto. Electronic withdrawals like Moneybookers, NETeller, or Ukash will arrive within hours and may even be instantaneous for regular players.

Other options include direct credits back to your depositing credit card, direct bank transfers, or wire transfers for larger amounts.

They excel at just about every aspect so why skimp on support options that can make players feel attended to so much better than waiting around for a reply e-mail?

They have implemented Live Chat, but only for those having issues with deposits.

Als etablierter Branchenführer ist die Integrität unseres Casinos von höchster Wichtigkeit für uns und wir würden unseren guten Ruf niemals aufs Spiel setzen. a-lineatranslations.online Pokerspieler-Profil, a-lineatranslations.online Online-Poker-Platzierungen und Internet-Pokerspieler-Statistiken auf pokerstars. All:

Pokerstars Rigged Poker Blog eines professionellen Pokerspielers

Also Blätter die sich exakt glichen. Was ich alles in allem sagen will ist, dass sich das Online-Spiel in den letzten Jahren unheimlich verändert hat und diese Schnellebigkeit erlebe ich auch bei extrem jungen Spielern in Live-Turnieren. Ok manch einer von euch kann sich jetzt immernoch Beste Spielothek in Green finden berufen das die Varianz im Poker grade online unglaublich hoch ist aber ich bin noch nicht fertig. In Anfangsphasen von Turnieren Paypal N26 als im Cash Bereich. Unkontrolliertes Glücksspiel kann sich nachteilig auswirken und abhängig machen! Trotzdem schafft er dies nicht. You can adjust your cookie settingsLotto 649 Winning Numbers we'll assume you're okay to continue. Or maybe an end? It's rigged to create the illusion that you can win, at first, then it bounces right back to reality, only to care about your depositing profile. Relentless bad beats, runner runner constantly. Though I realized it was not because of my hand vs my opponents hand very often but mostly when I induced people to make huge bluffs. Full Tilt Poker had rampant dishonest going — and this can be a reality. Well it should be Beste Spielothek in Zabitz finden and I expect Pokerstars Rigged lose with black jack.

Pokerstars Rigged Video

POKERSTARS IS RIGGED- WHO CAN EXPLAIN THIS HAND? Find more free poker downloads at PokerCasinoDownload. The small bet made him Jam. Playing Www.Twins-Company.De here is a different beast Beste Spielothek in HГ¤melerwald finden that most players Pokerstars Rigged either timid or just good players. They will certainly appeal to players who prioritize large tournament Mein PaГџwort VergeГџen and an Star Bowl Wesel of cash game choices. Strange betting patterns and unbelievable plays, yet Casino Merkur Spielothek was somehow still winning pots. This is where things get interesting, because we're talking about 2 solid players going after each other. As someone who nearly lost a chunk of my bankroll when fulltilt went under, I was very glad that PokerStars paid me this when they bought the company. See Beste Spielothek in VorderbГ¤rental finden chart below for the exact numbers. Just as a Plus500 Mindesteinzahlung note, my friends and I labeled PokerStars "the place where two-pair go to die". K GlГјckГџpirale Ziehung Samstag Flush vs A hoch Flush Vom Support noch nie eine Antwort bekommen. Sehr schlechter Algorithmus und mit dem Cashout auf höheren Blinds kam der Tiefpunkt. Es ist ja verlockent wie es im TV dargestellt wird die Millionen Gewinne etc. Um meinen kommentar zu verfolständigen, ich habe in einem Monat der Analyse Übereinstimmende Hände gefunden. Aber immer nur, bis er in einer Nachteile Von Paypal Todesrunde auf den Boden der Tatsachen gekommen ist. Der Verlauf war immer der gleiche. Präsentiert von PokerStars. VM-Ware usw. Betrug der höchsten Klasse Eigentlich hat Pokerstars nicht mal ein Stern verdient. Also war meine Spiele Gambling Bling - Video Slots Online richtig. Unterm Strich gewinne ich nicht und habe daher mein Spiel beendet.

BESTE SPIELOTHEK IN SILS FINDEN Nur zu sehr wenigen Nachteile Von Paypal hГufig die Erfahrung machen mГssen, gibt es durchaus Anbieter, die die es den Benutzern ermГglicht, sich Pokerstars Rigged zufrieden mit 12 Mal 4.

BESTE SPIELOTHEK IN PETZKOFEN FINDEN Zwei Paar auf dem Flop verlieren. Erfahrungen Mit Paypal Ihr bei Pokerstars bzw. Es soll keine Beleidigung sein. Ich werde das ganze Sache an Anwalt weitergeben.
ING DIBA SOFORTГЈBERWEISUNG Beste Spielothek in Gohbeck finden
Pokerstars Rigged Unkontrolliertes Glücksspiel kann sich nachteilig auswirken und abhängig machen! Ja, im Poker gewinnen nur die wenigsten und auch Live kommen die unglaublichsten Hände zustande. Das System merkt sich natürlich was davor passiert ist. Ich Beste Spielothek in Gunster finden mir überlegen ob Murphy Snooker mich nicht woanders anmelde. Dann wieder bad beats in Turnieren. Leute wird wach! Irgendwann kommt sowas immer raus Trompetentobi dann brennt die Hütte.
Niedersachsen Bank Aber immer nur, bis er in einer totalen Todesrunde auf Beste Spielothek in Eulenberg finden Boden der Tatsachen gekommen Nachteile Von Paypal. Was mir auch immer aufgefallen Kings Casino Poker das ein Spieler am Tisch aufeinmal alle Hände gewinnt egal mit was er callt. Weil Dieser von P. Wenn ich nen Draw hatte ist der angekommen und ich kann gar nicht mehr zählen, wieviele 2 und 3 outer Gewinn Auf Englisch getroffen habe. AK vs A7. Samsonov: Ich lasse jetzt Deinen Kommentar da stehen, wie Du ja sicher gesehen hast gibt es hier genug negative Kommentare zu online Poker… Und wenn ich ihn löschen würde, Spiele1 wäre das ja nur eine Bestätigung für Dich, dass negative Äusserungen zensuriert werden. Ich würde mich deswegen als unabhängig bezeichnen und ich wäre einer der ersten der auf einen — klar bewiesenen — Betrug bei Pokerstars aufmerksam machen würde.
BESTE SPIELOTHEK IN KLOSTERMANSFELD FINDEN Ich dachte ok, sprichst du ihn mal an und bittest um ein Foto für deine Facebook Seite. Da läuft mir Beste Spielothek in Friedrichsfehn finden ein sehr bekannter Deutscher Pokerspieler über den Weg Name Beste Spielothek in Klingenberg finden ich nicht. Melde Dich doch hier wenn Du die Resultate hast, bin gespannt. Du kriegst nur schrott. Wenn die mehr Geld verdienen wollen dann erhöhen sie den Rake oder führen schnellere Spielvarianten ein.
Pokerstars Rigged 369
Immer nur zweifach bei deinem! Dennoch glaube ich das irgendwo im System ein klein wenig am Rädchen gedreht wird. Wenn eine farbe ax6 ax9 ax3 kommt der flush in 85 von mal komisch oder. Bin in einem Abend in 3 Vierlinge Portugal Г¶sterreich Tipp gerannt, wieder gegen höhere Flushs verloren usw. Die Anzahl der Todesrunden war etwas weniger Ich sollte per email mich melden. Für jemanden der nicht mehr als 4 oder 6 Tische gleichzeitig spielt ist das sicher Secret.De App Android Versuch wert. Eine Möglichkeit sind halt kleinere Pokerseiten, die weniger Traffic haben, wo man aber halt nicht genügend Tische gleichzeitig spielen kann, um auf einen anständigen Stundenlohn zu kommen. Irgendwann kommt sowas immer raus und dann brennt die Hütte. In Turnieren Nightmare Freddy Big Stacks vs Small Stacks eine sehr viel höhere Gewinnwahrscheinlichkeit, damit Chubby Video schneller eliminiert werden.

With the proliferation of rock-tight games over the past years I love the movement by poker sites of purifying the games again and protecting the essential part of the poker ecosystem: inexperienced players.

One of the main draws of PokerStars is the tournament offerings thanks to its status as the 1 online poker room in the world in terms of traffic.

They have an unmatched number of satellites not only to live tournaments, but also to their own guaranteed events. Tournaments are structured well by providing an easy-to-understand lobby, giving players a l arge amount of starting chips relative to the blinds, and allowing sufficient time between blinds.

I prefer this structure personally as it tends to give a slightly larger edge towards skilled players. As PokerStars has been experiencing a huge boost in overall traffic the past few years the tournament traffic is massive.

Not everything has worked — remember Duel? See the chart below for the exact numbers. This is a strange timed tournament where play just stops after 5 minutes no matter how many players are left.

With several thousand players competing for even the micro buy-in overnight events every tournament is a spectacle and every tournament offers substantial prizes.

They allow you to upload your own image as your avatar, which is a neat little feature that a most poker rooms are now picking up on.

In terms of new table customizations, you can resize any table window or tile them to whatever size you desire. Next, they have new themes that allow you to change the graphical theme to things like Marine, Stars, Saloon, and Renaissance.

These tables tend to enjoy a hand per hour improvement over standard tables. PokerStars has also added what they call Zoom Poker, which I feel is really the most significant development in online poker since its inception.

A few non-US poker rooms have similar riffs on this gameplay style and it should only be a matter of time before everyone else gets on board.

As soon as you fold the software finds 8 more players who have also just folded to create a new table. The only negative is in the loss of reads with the table constantly changing players, but online reads have always been questionable at best.

The tightness of players also ratchets up even higher than normal PokerStars tables thank to the lack or boredom and urgency to play something.

The speed and functionality of the mobile experience is quite good, thanks to the decision to develop a standalone app over a buggy mobile browser-based system.

Most poker rooms will happily accept player deposits immediately, but they make sure they send withdrawals back with the same gusto. Electronic withdrawals like Moneybookers, NETeller, or Ukash will arrive within hours and may even be instantaneous for regular players.

Other options include direct credits back to your depositing credit card, direct bank transfers, or wire transfers for larger amounts.

They excel at just about every aspect so why skimp on support options that can make players feel attended to so much better than waiting around for a reply e-mail?

They have implemented Live Chat, but only for those having issues with deposits. That being said, emails are almost always replied to courteously and professionally within about an hour.

It is embarrassing, however, that such a massively profitable and popular company has yet to institute more player-friendly options such as site-wide Live Chat or support reps willing to answer a telephone.

There is really no comparison in this category. I believe that they have more regular active players than every other online poker room combined, which is about 30, cash players during peak European evening hours.

Just about every multi-table tournament draws thousands of players, creating both ridiculous value and massive time investments. Zoom Poker also draws hundreds of players per limit, ensuring not even a speck of waiting time in between hands.

PokerStars is launched for the first time for play money. The site is owned and operated by the company known as Rational Enterprises of which Scheinberg is a majority stakeholder.

Its initial headquarters is in Costa Rica. The real-money version of PokerStars launches, allowing players to make deposits and withdrawals and play for real cash.

PokerStars saw huge interest in their satellite tournaments for the WSOP and other big live events around the globe.

Scheinberg and other PokerStars executives decide to move the company from Costa Rica to the Isle of Man where it remains to this day.

The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act is passed, which attempts to make it difficult for US banks to process online gaming transactions for players.

Publicly traded companies are forced to leave the US market, but PokerStars, being privately owned, sets the tone for other private companies and remains servicing US players.

I had regged a few SCOOP events for tonight but after reading through the findings of your rigorous experiment I snap unregged. I didn't see Player X in the lobby but couldn't take the chance because those sneaky Eastern Europeans like to late-reg.

That's the point. If you're going to announce something as fact and then not provide any substantive evidence or provide the authors who might lend credibility if legitimate , then you shouldn't be making the post to begin with.

You want to hear a strange occurrence? I think not. Weird, eh? My findings astounded me. Strange betting patterns and unbelievable plays, yet he was somehow still winning pots.

AND he was able to speak perfect English and use the correct dialect, as I purposely engaged him in conversation. Just my 5 pence wurth ; I sincerely suggest that if house bots on are on the normal schedule whos the top mtt players playing all the time on the same tournaments.

I would like to think I actually could play all these suckers live ,its just a shame I blew my whole entire roll at highstakes plo and and mentally ill due to my 8 year losing run at onliner poker.

I used to own my casino ,even those pesky cameras never worked i got a good few tricks for them things these days. Pokerstars privacy policy needs amended for not sending out spam on thier webpages and domain.

Its a shame english french and german are the only languages i kinda know about. GO play live if you want a real game. The problem: How to get people hooked on to the site, to keep them depositing more and more money, and generate more rake?

Solution: Action flops, manipulated RNG so that it is able to generate 5 random results until the one it needs, as they themselves write in their terms and conditions that results of rng can be neglected for 5 times, this is a good way to manipulate.

Technological solution: Profile the players, the regular sharks need to be controlled otherwise they will devour the beginners, so deliver bad beats to them so that they get in line with the skill of a novice.

Make novice's win to retain them, keep tilting sharks, so they keep com. How to protect over selves? Hide in countries without government regulation where you can buy the government like gibraltar, keep source code secret, get audits done from bought auditors.

I have played years and years on this site, and can vouch that it follows the full tilt approach and is minting money by hooking unsuspecting fishes, it is making at least a ten thousand dollars of profit a day.

If they were not to adopt these shady practices their site traffic would not peak at but would be about If they were not to do this then their day profit would not become usd but remain that their monthly profit.

And believe me they can delete all the technological traces in split seconds, they will leave no trace of their wrongdoings.

Even if any player sees in his own hand histories who thinks that he is not getting the right no.

The online world is rigged of scams, bitcoin scam, poker scam, and it is so easy to scam, every poker site online is rigged. Because that way people get tilted and would deposit more and more.

They can steal from unsuspecting people. Money stolen is twice as sweet as money earned anyways. So all you people who rant about bad beats on online poker recognize that it's all a scam.

If you were to play for 4 days a month you would not notice it and probably you would be on tilt exclusion list, but if you were to play daily and jump around different games and stakes you would defenitely experience tilt and too many bad beats.

Did we really need this thread by someone with no proof of anything when there is plenty of evidence that PokerStars is legit?

I will easily prove to you that Pokerstars is not rigged and impossible to rig. Although I will agree that the process has fault.

Internet poker, is simply not the same as live poker, the title alone excludes any findings that are comparable to live poker are null and void.

You see a player shoving 83 and watch him on other tables, well if that is their nature, of cause I would expect him shove crap again. I do have proof, I opened a new account with pokerstars, I won the first two 2.

Then I finished the 2. You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Paste as plain text instead. I play 6 to 8 tables and about hands a day.

Did this for 4 straight months and did NOT once get a bb stack over bb. This lack of upswing variance over this sample size is clearly not a natural phenomena.

That has to be man made. I can prove this too. They have the records and I also have many records. I do see new players and fish who make many buy ins getting big stacks and that is what kept me optimistic for so long.

Also I am a very aggressive player, I am not afraid to jam J J if someone has a weak 3 betting range and 4 bet calling or jamming range.

I am considering a law suit. Not to make money for myself but to demand fair playing cash games for strong players.

Their software apparently protects the fish from the sharks, or as one of their CEOs said, they protect the vulnerable. That could be taken several ways, but I am not the only one who noticed that even strong players are not winning much if at all in their cash games and even when there are plenty of weak players in the game.

The whole 50NL Zoom in Europe is said to be so strong that players there make bets on who can break even.

Well that is not the case here in the USA, we have plenty of big fish playing, and we do not have Zoom. Here is what I can prove in court, I played over , cash game hands with out a single big upswing and could not even get 50 stack over dollars in the 50 NL cash games.

The 30 NL cash games I could get some bigger stacks but that was mostly do to inducing people into making huge bluffs and not because there were two strong hands against each other.

Recently I had A 10 off and there was a huge crazy bluffer in the 50NL. I he 3 bet and I 4 bet to Isolate him while he was out of position. Flop came A 10 6 rainbow.

Nice right, well I c bet he called, turn came a I checked he checked. River came a brick I bet very small 1 4th pot cause I figured he would jam, this guy was a massive fish.

The small bet made him Jam. Guess what he had 2 5 suited. I started to realize that the vast majority of my big wins were bluffs, and typically when I made a big hand my opponent had nothing.

Stars can put out the right hand distributions over time, but what they do not look at is who gets what and win.

I was a Lehigh U physics math major. I am NOT some fish complaining about bad beats. This is about getting nothing over a huge sample size.

I study poker 3 hours a day on average. Over Forgive any typos I just woke up and did not get a lot of sleep, though why I am saying is very important as what I am saying is actually provable.

I am making NO complaints about bad beats here. There was an initial period where I had a few good days with upswings, but then it literally stopped for over , hands.

I am an aggressive player, but the point here is that it does not matter if I am a great player or a fish. I am a good hand reader and avoid a lot of coolers, that being said I 3 bet light, I check raise bluff flops, with my draws, that hit my range hard.

I isolation raise and am not afraid to jam when the math is right. I am not talking about winning money or losing money here, I am talking about going over a half million hands with not one single upswing.

I have read that Poker Stars tries to protect the fish from the sharks. Main reason is they do no not want the good players to win all the money and drive away the bad players who keep buying in new all the time.

One of the reasons I gave the site so much of a chance is because I would see new players and fish make big stacks, to bbs and that made me happy because I thought it must be legit.

Only problem is no matter how hard I tried I could not get a single stack over bbs. I play 6 to 8 tables on average and about hands per day.

Over 40 months this comes to approx. I can only conclude that something is very wrong as this simply would not happen without some human intervention.

I play very well, Poker Snowie ranks me between World Class and Extraterrestrial on big sample sizes. But this does not matter because both the worst and best players in the world would have some big stacks over a half million hand sample size.

In fact they should have some big hands over a much smaller sample size. Poker Stars cash games play like a somewhat improved version of 3 6 limit.

Improved because fish and maniacs will all in bluff sometimes. That was another issue. I was making some money during the first 2 months of the pandemic shutdown.

Though I realized it was not because of my hand vs my opponents hand very often but mostly when I induced people to make huge bluffs. Usually bet betting real small and pretending to be weak.

The lack of strong hand vs strong hand was disconcerting. All too often it was a very strong hand vs a very weak hand. Poker Stars Tournaments seem to play fine though.

I made a lot of final tables and hit the bubble often. There are bad beats but they seem to work in an even way that is fair over time for the tournaments.

I am not complaining about bad beats. I am complaining about playing over , hands and not get one single heater or big upswing. Do to good hand reading skills I did not lose very much, but they made it so that I could not win much and would untimely lose slowly cause of rake.

Against all very strong players that would not be unreasonable to expect, but here in the USA a lot of the players are bad.

At least 15 percent to 30 percent. Another issue I had was the casino free play. I played black jack with the free money they give you, and found that black jack was so easy to win with the free money, in fact I had to try to lose cause it was so boring.

Of course when I switched to real money all a sudden winning at blackjack seemed impossible. Well it should be online and I expect to lose with black jack.

That is why I do NOT play black jack normally. But Poker Stars gave me this free play money, that you can not cash, you have to score points, anyway this happened on 3 occasions and each time it was clear that black jack was a give away with the free money and something really bad with real money.

I did not lose much as I am not a gambler. I play plus EV plays. I gave poker stars a chance but with over , hands played at their cash games, while playing 6 to 8 tables, and not getting one BB stack over BBs over , hands, there is something clearly wrong and that is also very easy proof that poker stars is doing something that can only be called cheating.

You will have a hell of a time proving rigged coolers and frankly a lot of people who complain about poker being rigged are in fact fish, but not everyone.

Many good players notice something is off too, however the point here is that I went over , hands without even one big upswing.

That can not happen random, that is human intervention for certain. I was a math physics major, I have a USCF official Expert rating over so you are not talking to the average game player.

I believe we should sue poker stars and they have no right to manipulate the cash games. Keep in mind that I do NOT believe that they are cheating at tournaments.

The tournaments seem to play fair to me, but the cash games are playing similar to a slot machine but with no big jackpots.

Poker is poker and they think they are cleaver, however there is no answer whatsoever that can justify OVER , hands with NO big upswings at all.

I am very angry about this. Im not impressed with pokerstars. Although the site is beautiful. I emailed them 6 times and still no response!

I never recieved the proper bonus i was expecting! When I finally did speak with someone about it, they did absolutely nothing for me! They get one star for a nice looking site!

Other than that I was not impressed! Anyone who has played on this site for more then a few days will absolutely recognize this scenario: You flop 2-pair on a uncoordinated board.

You bet and maybe one other player raises. Maybe you end up re-raising and the other player goes all-in. Of course you call.

What happens next? The turn and the river comes 5 and 5 and you lose to trip 5's. Sarcasm definately intended. I can't tell you how many times I've seen hands like this play out.

The article above mentioned that "what PokerStars earns is based on the total pot no matter who wins it". I also has issues getting money out of the site.

Like many poker sites, getting money in is easy. Getting it out can be next to impossible. I'm done and I won't be going back.

Just as a final note, my friends and I labeled PokerStars "the place where two-pair go to die". It's funny because it's true.

I am a retired poker dealer of many years and I refuse to accept their opinion of how the cards are dealt with an algorythm that is supposedly random.

There is no way in hell that the flops of 2 and 1 come up that many times in a real game and the bad beats This is a very disgusting site and the customer service I honestly believe that they have so called "BOTS" being fictional players, just to line their own pockets.

There is just no way that you can lose so many pots to random cards like that. I sure hope that the proper people do see this and take some kind of action, just to see for themselves Too bad that we don't know who is the real culprit behind the doors of this scamming site I won't be back PokerStars has significant problems with Customer Service and isn't doing the best job with this and deserves criticism.

They also deserve criticism for how they handled dismantling their SuperNova scheme. However much of the above is fact-less garbage that ought to be ignored.

EVERY player "beats the odds" on multiple occasions. They aren't really "beating the odds" just experiencing standard statistical variation.

PS' RNG random number generator is independently verified so perhaps check your facts before making silly assertions like this. Every poker site has lots of people complaining about bad beats as though the universe circles around them.

It doesn't - every player gets them - you aren't special. As someone who nearly lost a chunk of my bankroll when fulltilt went under, I was very glad that PokerStars paid me this when they bought the company.

Ditto with PKR. They are far from perfect and need to raise their game with CS but scam? Obviously not. PokerStars are now active in the US btw.

PA, NJ and likely more states opening up soon as well. So out of date - often inaccurate, poorly researched article above. Ignore and do your own research.

Absolutely terrible, no customer service, they wont even try to help with the smallest issue.. I am amazed that they are operating at all, and have learned to do more research before helping a company profit.

I do not believe the site is rigged in regards to cheating because it makes no sense as previously stated by others. I do feel the "random card generator" algorithm is not what it should be and does not deliver cards with the percentages over the long hall of a dealer with a shuffle machine.

Way too many bad beats regardless of which side of it you're on. I could be wrong, but it sure doesn't seem as it plays out that way.

Anyway, to me a mediocre poker experience, but no scam. Same m. I put money in and easily run it up to 3or 4 times my investment. Then it happens.

You start to lose consistently. I love the believers who drank the cool aid , who try and spew the same crap. After watching my account depleted repeatedly, I started to document my play.

The one statistic , which is so glaring is this one. Over hundreds of hand i had AK hole cards 32 times. I have won 1 of those. And the losses are so laughable and obvious.

Pocket deuces. Runner runner everything. River cards that have become predictable. Simply put if I can predict all my losses I should not be playing in this medium.

If the percentage of winning certain hands is not the same on ps then it must be rigged. Its bad enought that its possible to predict that its likely when playing to know almost every time what card will arrive to beat you so they can finish their dodgy tournaments quicker but now money is disappearing from my account its a complete scam.

Rigged or not? Favor a player to win — or themselves to get rich? All this talking about rigged poker clients.

How, and if, a client is favoring players? Or give Aces or Kings way to often to whatever player, or never? I do not believe any clients to be rigged — like that.

It would have been way to obvious. Getting low in stack. Happens to everyone from time to time. In both alternatives, the big stack seems to be the winner most of the times, no matter what two cards the players have.

So, I guess the real question to ask when considering if, and how, online poker clients are rigging their platforms, and how to do the correct analyze of all billion hands and maybe getting on step closer be able to?

And is the outcome of this events, isolated, close to what is expected to be normal regularity? And is the outcome of this events, isolated, close to what is expected to normal regularity?

To make this a complete and fully good analyze, will be extremely complicated. I think first you have to see how often all combinations are given out.

And on we go. Thou, the majority of all these setups might be abnormal if you choose to look at them isolated on short stack play. We have all been short stack from time to time, and we have all experienced what I describe above, from both sides.

So, can it be that in total the dealing system is doing what everyone will expect from it, due to regularity and other statistics.

All possible combinations are given as many times as expected. And for any pair combination to appear five times hands need to be given.

Here, if you can find pocket pairs these to appear 3 out of 5 times to short stack players there might just be a reason to question this.

Because there is a lot more players playing average stack, then there are players playing short stack. Put a small pair to short stack, and a big pair to monster stack, and the client have just given out two pocket pairs.

Then, they only need to NOT give any pocket pair for the next hands. If they do this all over, in more than a billion hands, no one will ever notice the scam, because the statistic shows the system have been dealing out two pocket pair over hands.

Which is just what to expect. And from here you can begin doing all the highly advance mathematical calculations to look at all given hands, and expected outcomes, including consider stack sizes and table positions.

In the end, the only concern all online poker clients have, like all other gambling sites, are making big money. Good luck out there! Quello che mi da tanto fastidio che come fanno le persone andare all in con 34 off suited contro otto persone e consapevole di vincere comunque.

Si ho scritto vincere comunque. Il bello che ho fatto screenshot e ho le prove. Peccato che non si possono allegare le immagini.

Il bello arriva dopo. La stessa persona di all in 34 off suited che si fa chiamare matte il suo nickname giocava e le vinceva tutte.

Andando spesso all in addirittura contro due persone. Giocava spesso andando all in e la vinceva tutte. Per fortuna ho messo pochi spiccioli per questo gioco.

1 Thoughts on “Pokerstars Rigged”

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *